Sign-up to our Newsletter

Loading...Loading...


Eisner Safety Consultants: Qmed Qualified Supplier
Print This Post Print This Post

EC asks for further scientific study & draws 1st lessons from recent fraud on breast implants

From the Europa website the following press release was issued on 2 Feb 2012. The complete press release is below.  The original press release may be viewed too.

wpid-100002010000003B000000270EAF35C1-2012-02-3-10-33.png

European Commission – Press release

Medical devices: European Commission asks for further scientific study and draws first lessons from the recent fraud on breast implants

Brussels, 2 February 2012 – Following today’s publication of the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) on the safety of silicone products manufactured by the Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) Company, the European Commission requested to conduct further in-depth study on the potential health impact of faulty breast implants.

The Commission will also discuss with the Member States how surveillance of the medical devices can already be reinforced immediately within the existing legislative framework. In parallel a “stress test” of the legislation on medical devices is under way in order to identify how best the questions raised by this issue can be addressed in the revision of this framework already foreseen for 2012.

Health and Consumers Commissioner, John Dalli said: “In the current situation, patients’ health remains the priority. The opinion published today sums up the current scientific knowledge on this case”. To add : “Furthermore, the Commission will discuss with the Member States a series of immediate measures to strengthen the existing surveillance and safety controls on medical devices already on the market. The capacity to detect and minimize the risk of fraud must be increased”. To conclude : “We had already been working on a revision of the Medical Devices Directive, envisaged for adoption  this spring.  We will now also take into account the lessons learnt from this case and take them on board in redrafting our legislation, in particular with regard to market surveillance, vigilance and functioning of notified bodies.”

Scientists concluded that data available today was insufficient to lead to firm conclusions regarding the health risk for women with PIP silicone breast implants.

The SCENIHR report (requested by the Commission in early January) stresses that, based on the limited data currently available, there is some concern regarding the possibility of inflammation induced by ruptured PIP silicone implants. The report concludes that each case needs to be assessed individually, so the advice remains that women who are worried should contact their surgeon.

Scientists also recommend that further work be undertaken as a priority to establish with greater certainty any health risks associated with PIP silicone breast implants, in order to ensure that potential risks are properly established, quantified and managed.

With regard to the question of whether the breast implants manufactured by PIP are more prone to failure than those of other manufacturers, SCENIHR said that PIP implants have been found to vary considerably in composition and as a result are likely to vary substantially in performance characteristics.

SCENIHR concluded on the basis of available data, that many PIP implants were manufactured from non-medical grade silicone. This type of silicone may contain some components that can weaken the implant shell and diffuse into the body tissues.

Next steps

First, the European Commission will ask the Scientific Committee to pursue a more in-depth investigation based on data from investigations by Member States.

Second, the Commission will discuss with the Member States how surveillance of the medical devices can be reinforced immediately within the existing legislative framework. These issues could include further recourse to unannounced inspections, enhanced controls of notified bodies and additional sample testing on products already on the market.

Third, the Commission is also conducting a stress test in order to identify how best the questions raised by this issue can be addressed in the upcoming revision of the legislation on medical devices which was already underway. The Commission still envisages adopting a proposal on the revision of the Medical Devices legislation in the course of this semester.

National health authorities in the Health Security Committee convene by audio conference today to discuss the follow up to the Opinion.

Background

Breast implants fall under the European legislation on medical devices1. This legislation requires that, before placing such devices on the market, the manufacturers must carry out an assessment to ensure that their devices fulfil the relevant legal requirements, and in particular that their devices will not compromise patient safety. For high risk devices, such as breast implants, a third party conformity assessment body, so-called notified body, is involved in the conformity assessment procedure.

In the present case, an investigation triggered by an unusually high short-term breast implant rupture rate has shown that a manufacturer (Poly Implant Prothèse Company) fraudulently made use of industrial silicone instead of the approved medical grade silicone. The product was withdrawn from the EU market in 2010.

On the basis of available data, it is estimated that around 400 000 PIP silicone breast implants were sold worldwide. These implants were available in nearly all European Union Member States – in particular they were widely used in the United-Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany, where respectively around 40.000, 30.000, 10.000 and 7.500 women were implanted with PIP silicone breast implants.

Work of the SCENIHR

SCENIHR is an independent advisory body established by the Commission. Its members are chosen on the basis of scientific excellence and they advise the Commission on issues associated with new and emerging health risks.

The current rapid opinion drew on top international scientists’ expertise in fields of plastic surgery, polymer science, senology and medical epidemiology.

To see the full scientific opinion on the safety of PIP breast implants, see

http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/emerging/index_en.htm

Link to Medical Devices Directive:

http://ec.europa.eu/health/medical-devices/regulatory-framework/index_en.htm

Contacts : Frédéric Vincent (+32 2 298 71 66) Aikaterini Apostola (+32 2 298 76 24)

1 :
OJ L 169, 12.7.1993, p. 1

Print This Post Print This Post

UK MHRA Revamped Website!

The new MHRA website home page is now live and you are being sent to the Home Page of the newly revamped site!

The UK MHRA has updated their website to be much more functional and you can find a lot of information about the Directives (i.e. MDD, IVD, & AIMDD) related to the medical devices. Also, you can find the UK transposed regulations and many other useful items such as classification information, borderline documents, the conformity assessment process, regulatory news, details on revisions of the MDD, Vigilance, Notified Bodies, and much much more. The site links you to multiple places to the Europa website for things such as the Interpretation & guidance documents and more…

If you are looking for information on Medical Devices under the MDD this is a good link to look at for lots of information on the subject.

If you are looking for information on Medicines legislation & directives this is a good link to look at for lots of information on the subject.

They even set-up a page for New Technologies Forums for both Medicines and Medical Devices.

Print This Post Print This Post

1 Step Closer to EU Medical Device e-Labeling

Per Eucomed’s  7 October 2011 newsletter electronic labeling of medical devices (MDD & AIMDD) has been approved as a draft regulation and is in the hands of “the Council and European Parliament who will have 3 months to exercise their right of scrutiny and evaluate whether the European Commission has exceeded its powers with this proposed regulation.

Final publication and entry into force is expected at the beginning of 2012.”

 

Print This Post Print This Post

Update on DRAFT NB-MED EN60601 3rd ed. Implementation for EU

16 Jan 2012

Just received an e-mail update on the status of the DRAFT NB-MED document on 3rd edition of EN60601 Implementation for the EU. The pertinent points are:

1) Substantial progress has been made over the last couple months on the document

2) The NB-MED has presented their observations and comments on the proposed document to the team proposal early in Dec 2011

3) The team has worked on integrating the observations and responding to the comments

4) on 13 Jan 2012 the group forwarded their results to the NB MED working group for their approval (validation).

5) It is expected that this document will formally be published hopefully within a couple of weeks not months.

For more details on this DRAFT document please go to http://wwww.EisnerSafety.com/draft-results-implementation-of-3ed-en60601-series-for-ce-marking/ for a copy of the DRAFT document and
http://www.eisnersafety.com/eu-en-iec60601-1-3rd-ed-request-for-issues-on-the-use-of-the-std-for-ce-conformity/ for the first announcement about this process.

Print This Post Print This Post

FDA Innovation Pathway – Tech that Address Unmet Med. Needs

Below is a copy from the FDA webpage on Innovation Pathway.

Innovation Pathway

Background on CDRH Innovation

On Feb. 8, 2011, the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health launched its Innovation Initiative, which proposed actions the agency could take to help accelerate and reduce the cost of development and regulatory evaluation of innovative medical devices in a way that maintains or improves patient safety and is based on sound science.

As part of that Initiative, the FDA proposed the Innovation Pathway, a priority program for technologies that address unmet medical needs in disease treatment, diagnosis and health care delivery. The FDA also announced a pilot submission — a brain-controlled, upper-extremity prosthetic — for review under the Pathway.

After considering public comments received on the Innovation Initiative — and extensive review of our experience from the pilot submission, the FDA is introducing the Innovation Challenge, a call for voluntary submission of innovative device applications for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).

Regulatory decisions that improve patient access to safe and effective,
 innovative medical devices

wpid-ucm286126-2012-01-13-09-19.gif

Developing a New Approach to Device Review
Background on CDRH Innovation

Bringing breakthrough, safe and effective medical devices to patients quickly, safely and efficiently improves lives and health care. To help reach patients with these devices as quickly as possible, the FDA created the Innovation Pathway — a priority program for technologies that address unmet medical needs in disease treatment, diagnosis and health care delivery.

The Innovation Pathway aims to shorten the overall time it takes for the development, assessment, and review of breakthrough medical devices. Some key areas of focus include the development of new decision tools to help the FDA assess and characterize benefits and risks to patients, and new collaborative ways for the FDA and innovators to share ideas about new device concepts. Where applicable, these new approaches, practices, and tools will be used in other pre-market programs.


Developing a New Approach to Device Review

Developing the Innovation Pathway is an evolving process that entails the FDA approaching medical device review using new paradigms — rapidly testing them, applying what works and learning from what doesn’t. A team of experts are analyzing each step of the premarket pathways for medical devices and exploring ways to bring about more patient-centric, predictable and swifter decisions that can also address the unique scientific challenges that innovative technology often brings. The team has begun developing new tools and processes, including:

  • A decision-framing tool to help reviewers and sponsors quickly determine product classification and regulatory direction;
  • A decision-framing tool to help reviewers and sponsors determine requirements for first-in-human clinical trials; and
  • A collaborative workspace where FDA staff, medical device developers, patients, scientists and industry can discuss the technology, intended use and the unmet public health need.

These tools, and others in development, present the FDA with the opportunity to commit its time and resources much earlier in product development. By front-loading these resources, the FDA can identify and resolve new scientific and regulatory challenges that may accompany an emerging technology that raises new or novel scientific questions. As a result, patients will receive safe and effective products more quickly and device makers can bring important technologies to market more predictably, faster, and at a lower cost.

In order to use and evaluate the new tools and processes, the FDA is inviting innovators who have ideas for medical devices that diagnose or treat End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) to volunteer for our Innovation Challenge. When proven successful, the FDA plans to integrate these new approaches into its other premarket programs when applicable.

Additional Information